Just Wondering!

Written by John (the other John).

Recently I was just wondering, why do cities/regions that excel in “diversity” have:

• Much crime
• Much poverty
• Vast majority fatherless households
• Horrible education systems
• Corrupt local governments
• Lack of respect for fellow residents
• Constant racial/ethnic tension
• Constant grievances & unhappiness
• Proud to being “diverse”
• Filthy streets and sidewalks
• Unsightly graffiti
• Homeless people sleeping in parks
• People exchanging drugs and needles in public
• Dilapidated housing
• Cramped spacing
• Santa Claus is mugged when he comes to town

And why do towns/regions who fail in “diversity” are:

• Safe (very low crime)
• Wealthy (very low poverty)
• Nuclear families (very few fatherless households)
• Very good education systems
• Less corrupt governments
• Respect for fellow residents
• Practically non-existent racial/ethnic tension
• Happiness
• Proud to not being “diverse”
• Clean neighborhoods
• Sightly landscaping
• Families walking in parks
• People exchanging well-wishes in public
• Nice housing
• Ample spacing
• Santa Claus is hugged when he comes to town

In addition to wondering about the above, I also wonder:

why is “diversity” promoted and forced upon us considering what a failure it has been/is? Is “diversity” intended to be a positive that had/has failed? Or is “diversity” intended to being a failure? And the cities/regions who excel in “diversity” have succeeded in failure?

I wonder!