Social Construct
In today’s wacky world of wokeism, we are often preached that everything that they hate is a “social construct” not based on nature, but rather based on a power play by oppressors to keep the oppressed people powerless; hence, the accusation being that our social mores and roles are randomly chosen tools to suppress people, for which wokeists label these as an “…ism…” or “,…phobia…”. But is this true? Of course not. Let us analyze some examples of some “progressive” ideas that people experimented with over the years that did not quite work out as hoped:
Race Roles
The main thing that wokeists want to destroy is the nuclear family because wokeists prefer nontraditional families consisting of multiple $€x partners, infidelity, and breeding kids with multiple baby mammas. What is odd though is that not only do wokeists promote this form of breeding, but they more so condemn the nuclear family as being a “social construct” to enforce “white supremacy” and “systemic racism” (in other words, they do not want people to even have a choice of having a nuclear family; they want it banned because they demand the eroticism and perversion of Sodom and Gomorrah). But let us analyze this, has the non-nuclear family have a history of success? And is a nuclear family lacking other critical factors able to being successful? And is a nuclear family complying with all critical factors destined for success? Let us see.
A non-nuclear family with traits such as: drugs, alcohol, criminality, gambling, perversion, infidelity, violence, antagonistic to education, has been a proven failure in the preceding approximately 60 years (and no doubt it failed in prior attempts; but I am open to examining documented evidence that contradicts my findings).
A nuclear family with traits such as: drugs, alcohol, criminality, gambling, perversion, infidelity, violence, antagonistic to education, has also been a proven failure.
A nuclear family with traits such as: God, country, family, education, hard work/industrious, integrity, courage, honesty, honor, logic/reason, objective truths, respectful, faithful, athletics, timeliness, invest/plan for future, responsibility, accountability, and restraint; these are a proven success.
So despite the proven success and proven failures for the above specified traits over a period of many years, wokeists are in denial of reality by labeling the nuclear family as a “social construct” to promote “systemic racism”; all this because groups that wokeists favour choose the lifestyles that result in failure, and groups that wokeists hate choose lifestyles that result in success.
Gender Roles
Similar to race roles, the wokeists want to dismantle the current “gender roles” by having men become women, and women to become men. As odd as this may sound, no doubt in the history of humans (and prior beings), these attempts of a gender-swap must have been experimented with, and of course it failed because reality does not bend to lunacy.
Perhaps in the year 1 million BC, some Neanderthal man experimented with nursing (breast feeding) a baby. Through much trial & error, he could not nurse the baby because he was a male, thus the baby died of starvation; and thereby abruptly ended this buffoonish attempt by men to breast feed babies. That is, up until the year 2020 AD when this became the official policy of the Obama regime (disguised as “Biden”).
Perhaps in the year 500,000 BC, a large group of Neanderthal men abandoned their tribe, and instead went to a deserted island to start their own civilization with many offspring to be born from them. They had $€x all day and all night with each other for a period of many years, but their attempts to procreate to birth children failed. This was not due to lack of trying, but these Neanderthal dudes just could not get pregnant. They tried for years, but to no avail. But by this point, they were too old and too exhausted to raft back to their prior tribe, so they died childless at an old age. And thereby ended this idiotic attempt by men to get pregnant; that is, up until the year 2020 AD when this became the official policy of the Obama regime (disguised as “Biden”).
Perhaps about 100,000 BC in Amazonia, a tribe decided to swap historical gender roles, by
the men raising the children,
The babies though did not do well with the men because the baby was attached to the mom after being in her womb for 9 months, so the baby did not eat (so it died).
the women hunted and gathered,
the women could not handle the stamina and strength involved for this, thus the people starved to death.
the women fought in battle
whole tribes got ki!!ed in battle because the women could not properly fight in battle against men
Thus the people of Amazonia died because men could not be women, and women could not be men.
Today, we have a large faction of people who seek to erase/ignore/denigrate the past, and instead they want to replace things based on their own deluded visions of how humanity should be (especially those lifestyles that have been proven as failures). For instance, wokeists believe that men can become women, and women can become men; and bad behaviour/bad life choices of blacks should be praised and rewarded, whilst good behaviour of whites should be condemned and punished. These large factions that I refer to are true-believers of fantasy/myth (which is financed and promoted by wicked billionaires who weaponize criminality and insanity as a tool to overturn society for their own profiteering).
So are these “race roles” and “gender roles” mere arbitrary “social constructs” whose purpose is to suppress women and blacks? Or are these roles (a/k/a “social constructs”) just the natural conclusions of 200,000 years of human experimentation? The answer is obvious that it was trial and error, and success and failure, that taught us what is true and what is false; what works and what fails. That is, except to those who are completely f’kd up in the head who want to erase the past, and whom want to play god.1
1 Much like the Red Holocaust in which Socialism killed an estimated 100 million people (and counting), OR, much like the mouse, the cheese, and the electric shock, only an idiot or an intellectual would want to re-try just one more time what has been proven to being an epic failure over and over again.
Posts
