One Article, Two Titles: “Denying My Right to Exist” Freedom is Not For Everyone

By John (the other John)

 

We constantly hear the allegation that “oppressors” (ex., straight white Conservative men) somehow “deny the right to exist” of “oppressed people” (ex., gays, trans, blacks, feminists, Muslims, etc… [pretty much the opposite of the “oppressors”). But what does this mean? Are straight white Conservative men actually trying to literally ki!! the “oppressed”? If yes, is it by a pistol? A knife? Poison? A rope? Starvation? A manufactured virus made in a laboratory in China? (Ooops, disregard this one, this virus was created with the intent to defeat Trump in 2020). Answer: none of the above. What this “denial of the right to exist” actually means is that our Founding Principles as a nation forbid these “oppressed” groups from taking away our freedoms; in other words, these “oppressed” groups want to have the freedom to make us alleged “oppressors” become unfree. Basically, they want to conquer us, our minds, and our assets; stated differently, they demand supremacy over us. 

 

Let me clarify. They believe that it is their human right and their manifest destiny to have:

 

• identity preferences in jobs and University admissions, even when they are less qualified;

 

• to burn loot and murder so they can seize what they did not earn;

 

• to conquer our lands because their “god” told them to conquer infidels; and take our assets and our women, while we pay them some form of tax for their kindness of allowing us to exist in our own nation; 

• to enter our nation illegally and get an eternity of free-stuff;

 

• to groom and molest our children;

 

• etc

 

You see where this is going, they believe (and thus demand) that this is their human right to dominate us, and thus by us denying them this “human right” to dominate us because our Founding Principles prevent that, they thus believe that we “deny their right to exist”; essentially, we prevent them from denying our right to exist in our own nation. Basically, their performance art narrative is that we commit genocide upon them by us refusing to submit to them (i.e., theft, murder, child molestation, free-stuff, identity preferences, etc,,, are essential to their literal existence [and an integral part of their identity], sort of like how air, water, and food are essential to our lives; and by us inhumanely denying them this, we are causing them to literally die).

That being said, it is sick-minded people like this who are extremely dangerous because just because we can now prevent them from committing atrocities upon us, what we need to be reminded is that American democracy is a numbers game, and if there are enough “oppressed”

 

people to outnumber us productive members of society, then they will control government and the Courts, and thus fulfill this tyranny that they savour. Which goes back to the title of this article, “freedom is not for everyone”¹, because a foundational attribute of freedom is to also respect the freedom of others (as opposed to your freedom to make others unfree).² And for those who believe it is their human right to make others unfree, then it is them who must be denied the power to rule.

1^ This principle of “freedom not being for everyone” especially applies to those who have no self-control or those lacking the ability to make wise decisions, who use their freedom (in their own opinion) for good intentions, but resulting in ruining their lives.

2^ Unrelated note here, but all these “oppressed” groups hate Jews for allegedly being the “oppressors”, yet it is the Jews as “God’s chosen people” who choose to live amongst themselves and to not conquer others. So basically, the accused “oppressors” mind their own business, and the self-labeled “oppressed” want to subjugate others. This is Orwell at his best!