Diversity (Bio-diversity): In Nature

 

We are constantly dictated on the singular meaning of “diversity”, which in reality is to dilute the power and numbers of straight white Conservative men, and to replace them (literally) with the opposite (ex., AfrArabistanis, Hispanics, trans, etc….). , and that we must submit to these latter group of people AND that we must affirm and celebrate our own demise and their ascension to power. So the question that I raise, is this consistent with nature?

Life on earth has existed for billions of years, whether it was dinosaurs, animals, plants, bacteria, fungus, bugs/insects, pre-human people, humans, etc…., and so many additional forms of life that we do not even know about. Human beings (homo sapiens) are (relatively speaking) the “new kid on the block” because they only existed for about 200,000 years, which means that their limited existence in the scheme of life on earth does not give them a monopoly on nature (despite them having a monopoly on the communication on this topic).

So let us discuss raw nature in the non-human world. As a starting point, nature has an enormous amount of diversity (a/k/a “bio-diversity”; significantly more diversity than is with humans). Next, regardless of the being, the one common feature is that nature is to “ki!! or be ki!!ed” amongst diverse groups of beings. Nature is not about friendship or getting along with dissimilar beings (ex., lions versus deer; fox versus bunny rabbit; eagle versus a mouse; crocodile versus a swan; pink flamingo versus shrimp, etc…), nor does the being that is on the losing side of the battle affirm and celebrate its demise. Nature is about predator and prey (whether in animals, plants, bacteria, fungus, humans, etc…).¹ The point being is that diversity and conflict go hand-in-hand; whether diversity causes conflict OR whether conflict is a natural feature of diversity, this goes beyond the point of this article, but what is key is that diversity results in m*rd€r.

So with billions of years of presumed knowledge on how diversity and hostility are interrelated, how is it that the most educated humans somehow believe that “diversity is a strength”? My opinion is that they know that diversity is a curse because it causes problems, but they promote this because the chaos caused by diversity gives them the opportunity to gain ever more power. And to add “fuel to the fire”, when diversity does as has been done for billions of years, the promoters of diversity pretend to being shocked that clashes arose between dissimilar people, and the only one’s blamed for this are straight white Conservative men (whom in reality are the intended target of this madness).²

Diversity in humans was never intended to work!

1^ Above I referenced to pink flamingos versus shrimp in the effort to demonstrate that one of the most beautiful and gentle creations on earth needs to also be a predator to (for example) shrimp so it can survive. The point of this is that even prey needs to be a predator to another being for its own survival.

2^ You have noticed that violent disputes amongst diverse beings in the animal kingdom never draw the ire of those people who promote diversity in humans, because they know that diversity is bad. That is why diverse animals in the zoo are separated from each other by barriers.

By   John (the other John)