Power for Power’s Sake, By Any Means Necessary

The Socialisms are a unique form of totalitarianism that is a novelty in human history. In the past, totalitarian governments competed against adversarial totalitarian governments by seeking to be more violent and domineering than the other to either conquer them or to defend itself from being conquered. This was the norm throughout the majority of the approximate 6,000 years of recorded human history (and likely the prior approximate 194,000 years of pre-recorded history). This ferocity was no different than that was in the animal kingdom. 

 

But then came the Anglo-American form of governing with liberty, equal protection, democracy, due process, consent of the governed, fairness¹, Bill of Rights, Christianity, and Capitalism; in which this form of governing excelled in becoming the global power. So when tyrannical nations became adversarial with Anglo-Americanism, it was no longer bad versus bad, but rather it was bad versus good; and of course the good prevailed in economy, human rights, and military.

But evil minds acted quickly to concoct a wickedly coherent ideology to compete against Anglo-American principles, and who better than Germans. Germany as a nation was all about the power of the State; power for power’s sake (even at the expense of profit).¹ The individual person did not matter; rather, a person was a mere tiny spec of a component to the larger mechanism of the State. Germans hated Anglo-American liberty, Christianity, and Capitalism; in other words, they hated our happiness. So German writers (including, but not limited to, Karl Marx) developed an ideology of power, hate, and envy to counter our freedoms, Capitalism, and Christianity.²

So basically, this form of Socialist totalitarianism (Communism, National Socialism, and wokeism) is unequal to historical totalitarianism because its creation was a reaction to our happiness and goodness so to justify themselves (as opposed to the historical Law of the Jungle). It wasn’t violence for violence’s sake, but rather there was an ideological “justification” for violence for persons seeking to uncork their inner demons in a group-setting. And for the unintelligent people, the explanation of this hateful and envious ideology was effective in convincing the lazy, the criminals, and the insane to being mindlessly animalistic in their violence towards successful people.¹

^ 1 The central theme being justice; right versus wrong.

 

^ 2 The central theme being power; winning versus losing. The law is arbitrarily applied as a weapon of   choice for people who are enemies of the regime.

 

3  Islam was also a reaction to the goodness of Jesus, but Islam did not have any traction in the 1800s (unlike today in Germanistan), so the Germans concocted an ideology that was relatable to the incompetent lazy and envious people in the West.

 

4  Germans and Muslims have been allies since prior to WWI because they share the common bonds of being militaristically totalitarian, they despise the individual in favour of the collective, they hate Jesus and capitalism, they punish alternate opinions, and both have a devilishly coherent violent doctrine that strives for utopia thru genocide.

By John (the other John)