Opinion: Now they're inheriting our country - Germany on the threshold of becoming a migration state
Written by Thor Kunkel for Tichys Einblick.
So the population exchange is happening after all – at least according to Behzad K. Khani, an author who has been positioned by the media to represent the generation of migrants who stand out with their very own view of their country of arrival. Behzad K. Khani, "nominated for the renowned Ingeborg Bachmann Prize" and "successful bar operator", appears as if he were aiming for the executive chair of the "New German Media Makers".
As far as his merits are concerned: the following is correct: a) Khani was one of 14 participants in the Bachmann competition and got nothing. And b) his "Gastro Adventure" had to close in October 2022. Uwe Tellkamp, for example, praised his novel "Hund, Wolf, Jackal" as a successful piece of literature.
However, in the text at issue here, Khani does not act as a novelist. But as a claimant. Khani is allowed to beat up the Germans with the Nazi club in the media. The Germans always keep quiet anyway, just as they kept quiet during similar failures by Ferda Ataman and Sawsan Chebli. According to our author, these Germans didn't deserve the New Year's riots in any other way. Anyone who messes up two world wars has to live with the fact that from now on they will be a country of immigration, and also that the immigrants mistrust the indigenous Germans for good reason, a "distrust that the allied victorious powers already shared".
So what rained down in Berlin and other cities last New Year's Eve was not at all a dominance ritual and a demonstration of "unserviceableness" towards the state, but an honorable attempt to prevent a Fourth Reich: YO! WE ARE HERE SO THAT THE ARIAN NIGHTMARE DOESN'T BECOME REALITY! He reinterprets the imported violence as a potential for control and rebellion, whereby Khani does not, like other migration lobbyists, refer to the alleged discrimination against his peers, but to the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945. His peer group would then be something like a paramilitary caste, which the Germans have to accept as punishment for - well, you know -.
That's interesting, because the government's immigration policy, which borders on insane, would then have a secret political dimension against its own core population, vulgo: the people. How true could that be, considering that all of German politics over the last two decades created the conditions for the status quo horribilis? Is it all coincidence? Or you didn't know any better, like Goethe's sorcerer's apprentice?
As an enlightener, Bhezad Khani provided a memorable impetus with his text, which should actually trigger a major debate in any normally functioning society.
In plain language, his text says the following: This is Germany, the country that we must conquer. Its residents are wimps - addicts to their hedonistic passions and inner insecurities. You're morally vulnerable, so we're going to dig in. In fact, we are here so that the German disappears forever. And if he doesn't want to, we'll help. That, nothing else, is the consequence.
Now, Khani's anti-defeatist self-empowerment fantasies aren't really new. The reciprocal production of moral politics and history of violence is well documented. Their colonialist and racist-anti-Semitic signature has been analyzed to the extreme in Germany of all places - the country that Khani distrusts - for 70 years. What is new, on the other hand, is that an author who one would like to think of as (reasonably) young and left-wing is de facto starting from a process that the media has so far relegated to the realm of right-wing extremist fables.
Khani did not use the word "repopulation". But his text proves that he sees in the current immigration policy the continuation of a measure originally initiated by the Allies. Because integrated or not, the author thinks he knows one thing: "We migrants will inherit this country." That only works if the "organic Germans" disappear anyway. How does that work? Is it really to be assumed that the Germans will forever stand idly by and watch the activities of their elite? Are scenarios that Michelle Houllebecq called “reverse Bataclans” in a recent interview really unthinkable in Germany?
Later, Khani does not awkwardly backtrack behind public opinion forecasts, probably because he himself realizes which narrative he is using. Since the Germans are dying out anyway, “their country needs about 15 years. 400,000 new workers, that is about a million immigrants a year”. Here, too, the consequence would be that there would be an exchange of the population, albeit a completely natural one. The visible examples prove him right. Not only Khani, but also Sawsan Chebli and unknown poster artists from Konz, who ironically ironize the flaring fears, repeat his slogan: Germans are losing the ground under their feet.
First of all, one has to say: In view of such numbers, which lack any basis in the real economy, Khani should apply straight away as a fact checker for the public broadcaster. On the other hand, the fact that very few immigrants are suitable for the German labor market is proven – by numbers. They don't even arrive. Almost two thirds of all employable Syrians in Germany are currently living on Hartz IV. Among Afghans it is "only" 43.7 percent.
According to this, a good half of the “1 million immigrants a year” demanded by Khani would go directly to welfare. What country could afford such an influx of welfare recipients? One would like to say that like every family, the state can also spend more than it earns over a certain period of time. If this does not change, national bankruptcy threatens. And should the Germans really die out, that would also mean the end of the German taxpayer. What would follow would be an exodus of all those who currently see Germany as a mixture of gold mine and dung soil. You almost want to wish fervently that Khani was right.
So the population exchange is happening after all – at least according to Behzad K. Khani, an author who has been positioned by the media to represent the generation of migrants who stand out with their very own view of their country of arrival. Behzad K. Khani, "nominated for the renowned Ingeborg Bachmann Prize" and "successful bar operator", appears as if he were aiming for the executive chair of the "New German Media Makers".
As far as his merits are concerned: the following is correct: a) Khani was one of 14 participants in the Bachmann competition and got nothing. And b) his "Gastro Adventure" had to close in October 2022. Uwe Tellkamp, for example, praised his novel "Hund, Wolf, Jackal" as a successful piece of literature.
However, in the text at issue here, Khani does not act as a novelist. But as a claimant. Khani is allowed to beat up the Germans with the Nazi club in the media. The Germans always keep quiet anyway, just as they kept quiet during similar failures by Ferda Ataman and Sawsan Chebli. According to our author, these Germans didn't deserve the New Year's riots in any other way. Anyone who messes up two world wars has to live with the fact that from now on they will be a country of immigration, and also that the immigrants mistrust the indigenous Germans for good reason, a "distrust that the allied victorious powers already shared".
So what rained down in Berlin and other cities last New Year's Eve was not at all a dominance ritual and a demonstration of "unserviceableness" towards the state, but an honorable attempt to prevent a Fourth Reich: YO! WE ARE HERE SO THAT THE ARIAN NIGHTMARE DOESN'T BECOME REALITY! He reinterprets the imported violence as a potential for control and rebellion, whereby Khani does not, like other migration lobbyists, refer to the alleged discrimination against his peers, but to the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945. His peer group would then be something like a paramilitary caste, which the Germans have to accept as punishment for - well, you know -.
That's interesting, because the government's immigration policy, which borders on insane, would then have a secret political dimension against its own core population, vulgo: the people. How true could that be, considering that all of German politics over the last two decades created the conditions for the status quo horribilis? Is it all coincidence? Or you didn't know any better, like Goethe's sorcerer's apprentice?
As an enlightener, Bhezad Khani provided a memorable impetus with his text, which should actually trigger a major debate in any normally functioning society.
In plain language, his text says the following: This is Germany, the country that we must conquer. Its residents are wimps - addicts to their hedonistic passions and inner insecurities. You're morally vulnerable, so we're going to dig in. In fact, we are here so that the German disappears forever. And if he doesn't want to, we'll help. That, nothing else, is the consequence.
Now, Khani's anti-defeatist self-empowerment fantasies aren't really new. The reciprocal production of moral politics and history of violence is well documented. Their colonialist and racist-anti-Semitic signature has been analyzed to the extreme in Germany of all places - the country that Khani distrusts - for 70 years. What is new, on the other hand, is that an author who one would like to think of as (reasonably) young and left-wing is de facto starting from a process that the media has so far relegated to the realm of right-wing extremist fables.
Khani did not use the word "repopulation". But his text proves that he sees in the current immigration policy the continuation of a measure originally initiated by the Allies. Because integrated or not, the author thinks he knows one thing: "We migrants will inherit this country." That only works if the "organic Germans" disappear anyway. How does that work? Is it really to be assumed that the Germans will forever stand idly by and watch the activities of their elite? Are scenarios that Michelle Houllebecq called “reverse Bataclans” in a recent interview really unthinkable in Germany?
Later, Khani does not awkwardly backtrack behind public opinion forecasts, probably because he himself realizes which narrative he is using. Since the Germans are dying out anyway, “their country needs about 15 years. 400,000 new workers, that is about a million immigrants a year”. Here, too, the consequence would be that there would be an exchange of the population, albeit a completely natural one. The visible examples prove him right. Not only Khani, but also Sawsan Chebli and unknown poster artists from Konz, who ironically ironize the flaring fears, repeat his slogan: Germans are losing the ground under their feet.
First of all, one has to say: In view of such numbers, which lack any basis in the real economy, Khani should apply straight away as a fact checker for the public broadcaster. On the other hand, the fact that very few immigrants are suitable for the German labor market is proven – by numbers. They don't even arrive. Almost two thirds of all employable Syrians in Germany are currently living on Hartz IV. Among Afghans it is "only" 43.7 percent.
According to this, a good half of the “1 million immigrants a year” demanded by Khani would go directly to welfare. What country could afford such an influx of welfare recipients? One would like to say that like every family, the state can also spend more than it earns over a certain period of time. If this does not change, national bankruptcy threatens. And should the Germans really die out, that would also mean the end of the German taxpayer. What would follow would be an exodus of all those who currently see Germany as a mixture of gold mine and dung soil. You almost want to wish fervently that Khani was right.
Source: Tichys Einblick
Posts
