Germany: Yes to the persecution of its own people - No to the investigation of Islamist terrorists
Do the police and judiciary apply different standards to right-wing extremists and Islamists? Some are controlled, others are simply left to their own devices.
You almost regularly see seach tents in the so-called neo-Nazis demos.
Like in Dortmund, for example, a temporary stronghold of right-wing radicals. In 2018, police chief Gregor Lange declared at a right-wing extremist demonstration under the motto “Europe Awake” that “violent enemies of the constitution have no chance” in the democracy stronghold of Dortmund.
Before the neo-Nazis were allowed onto the meeting grounds, they were searched in two tents and their personal details were determined. The police chief justified this by saying that the participants had to be checked for weapons and anti-constitutional symbols. This is a condition for the approval of the demo.
Similar pictures in Bielefeld in 2018. During a right-wing extremist march for the imprisoned Holocaust denier Ursula Haverbeck (95), all neo-Nazis had to go into a green tent in front of the main train station, where they were filmed and searched by police officers. Only then were they allowed to take part in the demo.
The police applied for these requirements and the courts approved them. Although the Federal Constitutional Court had already decided in 2010 that police officers are no longer allowed to search demonstrators without clear suspicion.
Even back then, the Berlin police did not find this problematic, there was no need to change previous practice, and they had only carried out preliminary checks on the basis of a concrete suspicion of danger.
At a large neo-Nazi demonstration in Berlin, the participants were led into specially constructed tents, where they were extensively searched. The assembly authority had also set the conditions there.
But now that well over 1,000 aggressive Islamists marched in Hamburg, should all of this no longer apply?
The demonstration took place on Steindamm, of all places. Just six months ago, 500 Islamists, presumably from the environment of “Muslim Interaktiv”, the current demo organizer, brutally attacked police officers with stones, bottles and battens.
But apparently that is not enough to use this knowledge to ban a demonstration by violent Islamists.
Police spokeswoman Sandra Levgrün told Bild: “There must be actual evidence that there will be violent riots during the meeting.” Suspicion alone is not enough for a ban.
The police spokeswoman went on to say that calling for a caliphate was not a criminal offense. There were strict requirements, for example no terrorist propaganda, no hate slogans, no violence. The Islamists remained peaceful.
But were the radical extremists at least recorded with personal details, as is usual with right-wing extremist demos?
Levgrün: “Some of the participants are known to the police from previous demonstrations. But no 1,250 identity checks were carried out.” Because: “A legal basis is required for both identification processing and video recording.”
The police always correctly find this legal basis for right-wing extremists. Strangely enough, this is not the case with Islamists.
Islamist shocks with caliphate speech on TV
An Islamist mob that hates German culture, its values and its legal system is screaming for a caliphate on the streets of Hamburg. And now she's getting support from a broadcasting councilor at Hessischer Rundfunk. Khola Maryam Hübsch defended the caliphate demonstration on “hart aber fair” on ARD.
Hübsch has covered his chin and head with a moss-green headscarf. She wears a heavy, brown, large coat. The woman from Frankfurt smiles with every sentence she says. But what has been said sounds like poison darts against the German constitution.
Hübsch is one of the faces of the new Islam in Germany. She is the daughter of the convert and left-wing radical sixty-eighth “Hadayatullah” (née Paul-Gerhard) Hübsch. Before his death, he said he arranged his daughter's marriage according to Islamic tradition.
Hübsch, who is a representative of the Muslim communities in Hesse, instead raves about an Islamic religious leader: “I belong to a community that has a caliph. A global caliph.” The Frankfurt native is a member of the Ahmadiyya community, which is led by the Pakistani Mirza Masroor Ahmad. She sees her caliph as a world political leader who is committed to peace and speaks to the world's major powers.
What she ignores is the religious fanaticism of the caliphs: the predecessor caliph of the Ahmadiyya community, Hazrat Mirza Tahir, said, for example: Anyone who eats pork becomes homosexual. The Ahmadiyya youth organization rambled years ago: “A shameless animal like the pig shapes or supports the development of certain behaviors in the consumer.”
Klamroth asks Hübsch: “Don’t you see the demo in Hamburg as a problem?” The posters contain hateful slogans such as “values dictatorship”, anti-Israel slogans and the call for an Islamic religious dictatorship in Germany: “Caliphate is the Solution."
Instead, Hübsch wants to differentiate the demo. She says: “The problem is when the demonstration is not classified. It's a small minority. And also how to understand these slogans.” Murmurs among the participants: How do you want to understand the posters differently?
Then Hübsch attacks CDU man Voigt: “Shariah does not belong to Germany. For me this is populism. Sharia and caliphate have become fighting terms. In the Islamic world, this is completely normal terminology.” For the Frankfurt resident, Sharia only has good sides. She says enthusiastically: “If a Muslim is good to his neighbors, if he works for the common good, if he does voluntary work, then he follows Sharia law.”
She then claims: “Muslims must abide by the laws of the country in which they live. This is part of Sharia law. The construction that politics creates that there is a contradiction between Sharia and the state is a fantasy.”
What she doesn't say, but which is also part of Sharia - Islamic law - and is enforced with brutal force in countries like Iran or Afghanistan: the compulsory headscarf for women who have hardly any other rights, flogging, hand and foot amputations for theft, stoning for “offenses” such as homosexuality, and much more that is considered medieval in Germany.
"We observe people making jokes about the Greens, but not Islamists"
Islamists are marching in the middle of Germany, demanding the establishment of a caliphate! Now in an an article published on Bildplus an employee of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution raises the alarm. He joked that the German domestic secret service far too often doesn't pay attention to Islamist threats. One reason: the left-wing political consensus.
The full article can be read on Bildplus.
Posts
