Germany: Scientists criticize the sexualization of children by ARD and ZDF
Finally, well-known 120 experts as initial initiators have found the courage to denounce the sexualizing indoctrination of our adolescents. A 50-page dossier has just been published, with which renowned scientists and medical specialists are tackling this indoctrination. The initiators have looked at numerous ARD/ZDF products over the past four years. Among other things
- the program "Quarks" by the "science journalist Ranga Yogeshwar (WDR),
- various ZDF programs,
- the "Broadcast with the Mouse" (WDR) and numerous others.
1. "Broadcast with the Mouse" (WDR). There, Katja (formerly Erik) explains in a seven-minute post what it means to be trans. "How Erik Katja became, she can best tell us herself," the article begins. Because Katja was born a man. But Katja realized early on that she couldn't identify with her biological sex: "You're born with male sex organs, i.e. with a penis, but you know deep down that you're not. I am a woman,” explains Katja.
2. ZDF Logo showed the transgender boy Tim on October 9, 2021. The opening credits read: "13-year-old Tim is transgender. He was born with a girl's body but feels like a boy."
3. ZDFneo is about “non-binary” people in May 2022 in a six-part “ instant drama series ”. The pre-announcement reads: “'Becoming Charlie' is about Charlie's search for identity. Charlie doesn't feel like a woman or a man. But what is Charlie then? The search and finding of one's own non-binarity not only catapults Charlie, but also Charlie's environment, out of the comfort zone and shakes up seemingly irrefutable truths.
Incidentally, adolescents can easily find relevant pages “pro” to gender reassignment. There are around 43,000 videos on YouTube alone - including the corresponding ARD/ZDF products.
Back to the current initiative, which was thankfully made public by the Welt. There, the renowned critics present their 50-page dossier in abridged form.
Among other things, the critics write:“We scientists and doctors call on public service broadcasters to present biological facts and scientific findings truthfully. We demand a departure from the ideological approach to transsexuality and a fact-based presentation of biological facts according to the state of research and science.
We, the undersigned, as academics, have long observed how public service broadcasters have embraced portrayals of 'queer' transgender ideology while denying scientific facts.
The starting point is always the false claim that there is not only one male and one female gender, but a variety of genders or intermediate stages between man and woman. The clear-cut notion of sex, which enables anisogamous reproduction, is conflated with psychological and, more importantly, sociological claims, with the result that conceptual ambiguity arises...
The subject of 'trans' is brought to children and young people through public broadcasting, with the result that the number of children and young people treated for gender dysphoria has increased twenty-five-fold in less than ten years.”
And then the devastating verdict: “This trans hype is fueled in TV programs, radio reports and on the social media channels of public broadcasting and the 'way to the right body' is described as an easy step. It's about girls who have their breasts and uterus surgically removed and the use of puberty blockers, drugs that temporarily prevent primary and secondary sexual characteristics from developing. The possible, sometimes irreversible, physical and psychological consequences of such measures are not described.”
The initiators also criticize the fact that queer/trans lobby groups spread specific claims in public service reporting, namely that one can change one's biological gender by identifying oneself socially with this gender.
Realpolitik background: The "traffic light" government coalition plans to replace the previous "Transsexual Law" with a "Self-Determination Law". According to this, everyone could change their gender entry through a speech act and, at the age of fourteen, children could decide on a hormonal and surgical adaptation to the opposite gender, even against the will of their parents.
Among other things, the analysis of the experts and medical specialists leads to a strong criticism of a PR practice that has little to do with journalistic information and due diligence as well as balance. Above all, the initiators appeal to the directors and the radio and television councils to take their duty of control seriously within the framework of the statutory framework.
The latter should put that behind the mirror. Above all, however, the “traffic light” with its “queer” representative Sven Lehmann should finally come to its senses and cool down its “transgender hype”. Because it borders on child abuse to unsettle adolescents in particular in the midst of their pubertal search for identity and to force their supposedly simple, but irreversible and traumatizing solutions with “transgender”.
Source: Tichys Einblick
Posts
